20100430

D - Fence

I stayed up really late last night to watch the Michael Kimball and Andy Devine Live Giants reading.  Man, what a great idea.  And what a great reading.  I especially enjoyed the conversation that ensued as well as Andy's ideas on grammar.  I had more questions for her, especially about her online biography, and I wonder if she would bracket herself in the conceptualists.  Probably not.  But still, would love to hear more from her.  I think I need to get her book.

I've only read M.K.'s stuff online and I particularly enjoyed the erotica in Unsaid.  I don't really know what's going on there that I like so much - the flatness of the language?- but I really hope he gets it published in toto.  Also, I've been trying to get my hands on Dear Everybody for a while now, and now it looks like I absolutely have to.  Such sweetness.  I'll have to try and forget his voice though -even though it's a nice voice- because I hate reading with other people's voices in my head.

The other day I went to a basketball game.  It was really surreal.  The Germans chant 'defense' but it sounds more like 'dUhFens.'  It took me a really long time to figure out why everything felt so strange.  Then I remembered this:



It was really fun though.  And the players weren't all that bad, if only a little sloppy.

Sloppy like me.

The day before that I ate a lot at a party.  Most of the other people talked.  I drank a lot of wine and ate more than my fair share of risotto.


Speaking of food and HTML Giant, Blake Butler wrote a really honest interesting account of his eating habits.  I can sympathize with the ex-fatty thang.

But, yeah, what a great reading.

20100427

New New New New New

the NEW issue of 032c looks promising:


the NEW artist website by Terry Berlier is fantastic:


(check out her collaborations with Luciano Chessa, especially Louganis and Inkless Imagination.  I love her video work.)

the NEW M.I.A. is pretty intense.  I love the whole Suicide meets Karen O. thang on "Born Free."  Didn't really expect that one.  But that's the fun of M.I.A.  The video is pretty disturbing.  It reminds me of this one really great Hitchcock quote, where he says the biggest mistake he ever made in his movie history was letting this little boy die; that you lose an audience after such a tragedy.  What happens to you when the little boy dies in the video?


I made a NEW mixtape.


these NEW plays I'm reading are difficult.  I'm wondering what a theater for the future would look like.  I think it would look a lot less like the plays I'm reading.  I think it would probably look a lot more like the Nature Theater of Oklahoma


or SIGNA


or Schlingensief


These are interesting because of their extrapolations/syntheses/abandonments of the two major histories of 20th century theater (Brecht v. Artaud) and not just their 'avant-garde' posings.  What's to be done with conventional theater? That wants to be avant-garde?


In weirder news, I just read that Thomas Bernhard did a comparative study of Brecht and Artaud for his honors thesis, just like I did.  I've gotsta get my hands on that.

20100423

All over the place



This kind of stuff is really fun.  The Road was really not fun.  It was another example of the self-loathing of late capitalism.  Of cheapened Tarkovsky brushstrokes.  Of watered down emotions and cliches.  Of the everlasting Christian morals.

What does it mean that I loathe The Road?

Another question:

Why is America so obsessed with the Post-Apocalyptic right now?

I'm sure someone would say something about climate change and that someone is probably right, climate change probably has something to do with it, but I think what's most distressing is how self-serving this movie is.  That somehow we're always right and good; even when we do things that are wrong, we still 'carry the flame.'  It's a nice way to sweep a lot of problems under the rug.  Oops, we bombed you?  But we've got candy!  You like candy, right?  We'll be friends tomorrow, I promise!

Other questions:

Do we no longer believe in a future worth making?

When was the last time someone presented a world worth believing in?  When was the last time people dared to be hopeful and not just critical or complacent?  In literature?  In film?  In the visual arts?



Maybe I would have liked The Road more if it would have been less transparently manipulative.  If the suspense moments like the threats of killing themselves were threats that I could have taken seriously.  Can you imagine a Hollywood movie where the 'main' character kills himself in the first 20 minutes?  Can you imagine what kind of commercial flop this would be?  Can you imagine that it might be glorious and beautiful if a wholly different story emerged instead of the one you had expected?



I've been thinking about form a lot lately.  About the fact that I can eat 4 eggs and 4 potatoes in a tortilla española but only 2 eggs and 2 potatoes if I eat fried eggs and patatas bravas.  About the fact that there's the same amount of oil in both and not much difference in the cooking time.  That really, the only thing different about them is the form.  That form is actually a wildly important thing.  Nourishing, nourishing form.



20100422

Read All About It

i haven't written a word in weeks.  weeks.  is this distressing?

instead i've been working out, giving my liver a workout, and moping about.  a friend suggested i do less moping and more mopping.  if only cleverness weren't spot on.

i think it's really hard to enjoy these dry spells.  not that there are no ideas floating around, but the idea of spending time at my desk has been less than attractive.  is it the spring weather?  the first publication in a journal i really like?  the endless biking?  all the good books i've been reading?  the mixtapes i've been obsessing over?

i watched 'lagerfeld confidential' twice and will watch it again.  is it worrisome that i feel like he's a bit of a soulmate?  that i feel like i have the 'lagerfeld curse'?  that we're very similar only that he's, you know, gay and way more fashionable than i'll ever be?

today i was in the library and i felt like a spy.

yesterday i swam past a machismo whose flowing hair looked like a bikini top.

the day before someone stole my broken umbrella.

the days before that were mostly occupied by lying in bed.

moaning.

20100420

True Romance



20100417

"Birthdays was the worst days, now we sip champagne when we're thirstay"





This is perfect for today.  Thanks to all my friends for their greatness.  Props to Nadja for the lovely Buoycat drawings.  I've decided once & for all that I don't actually hate wearing sunglasses.  In case anyone's keeping track...

20100416

"The cool moisture of snails irrigated my joints"


I made another mixtape.  Somebody stop me.

20100415

Luci Mie Taditrici or The Good, The Bad & The Ugly


I reviewed Luci Mie Traditrici here.



(fyi, that's a different production)

Here's the original layout, which I prefer:

Luci Mie Traditrici or The Good, The Bad and The Ugly 
A review by Shane Anderson

Director: Rebecca Horn, 2008
Music: Salvatore Sciarrino, 1998
Conductor: Beat Furrer
Ensemble: Klangforum Wien

La Malaspina / Soprano: Anna Radziewska
Il Malaspina / Baritone: Otto Katzameier
L’Ospite / Counter Tenor: Kai Wessel
Il Servo / Tenor: Simon Jaunin
‘Performer’: Antonio Paucar

Summary:

A Duke receives a Visitor, the Duchess cuckolds the Duke, the Duke slays both the Duchess and the Visitor.  The Duke repents. 

Words ebb and flow out of mouths, the music is like sea foam. 

The violence of silence and the already known.

The Good: ‘No, se dal sangue la rosa ebbe il natale’

Horn’s production was at its most successful when it explored the uncanny (such as the cloaked figure that sung the prelude from upstage or the other cloaked figure which slunk across the stage during Act II’s 3rd Intermezzo) and its relationship to the skeletal, dare I say, minimalist, structure of Sciarrino’s music.  These moments made the music’s near silence feel threatening.

This threatening, potentially dangerous, dimension was also explored in Horn’s use of a falconer stroking a tempered falcon upstage, as well as chairs elongated on point-standing knives.  When Horn created a sense of tension on stage – the sort of tension that was explored in the libretto as well as musically in Sciarrino’s score, which wove together a number of nuanced gestures (including a process of extension and compression in the voices, which created a certain tension to the words, the plot and to operatic tradition by extension) with a disintegration of late renaissance (the Intermezzos are particularly demonstrative of this aspect) – Horn was able to ‘bloom roses from blood,’ as the libretto suggests.  It was an unspeakable beauty.

I often held my breath.


The Bad:  ‘Mio destin così vuole’

Whether one finds a plot like Luci Mie Traditrici’s ‘tried and true’ or ‘tired and terrible,’ is a matter of contention, and frankly, irrelevant.  What’s important, however, is that the libretto and the music can be understood as soup stock – the score and libretto reduced gestures and themes and traditions to their most flavorful essentials; thereby allowing themselves to serve as the basis for a potentially wonderful, rich soup (read for: opera experience) in the hands of a master chef.  Instead Horn’s production, when it wasn’t exploring the uncanny, felt like a mouthful of sand.  It was mostly sand.

The movements of the actors were arid, repetitive and distracting.  Horn failed to extrapolate on the plot and the textures of the music in a way that would have done them justice; and the gestures felt like The History of Opera in slow motion on an old VCR.  It was like a video piece of a museum piece. 

Most distracting or unfortunate, however, proved to be the tent-like bed on stage that wasn’t only hideous, but also followed the chalky Chekovian principle of props (which, here, can be stated thus: “if there’s a covered structure on stage, then it’s going to uncover something in the end”), which is neither nourishing nor refreshing. 

I held my breath, yes, but my eyes were often closed.


The Ugly:  ‘A Dio, a Dio, sempre vivrò in tormento’

After the performance, I talked to a friend.  One of us mentioned the set.  She said something about the 80s.  I said something about the 80s.  I said, “it really distracted me, I can’t believe that anyone would use such a blatant rust colored red for a bed someone would die on.”  She said, “yes, but it was the 80s,” meaning that we should forgive them.  I said, “but the piece was composed in 1996.”  She said, “did Rebecca Horn design a stage for the future?”  We both laughed.  I said, “Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice” and then Michael Keaton shot up out of the stage and his head spun around and he laughed real loud as snakes came out of his eyes.


Final word: It was a mediocre performance theatrically and a spectacular one musically.  Unfortunately, they were not integrated enough to compensate for any of their internal weaknesses.  Beat Furrer and his Klangforum Wien Ensemble, who were spot on, nevertheless, kept me rapt and wanting more.

20100414

I Didn't Have to Use My AK

Yesterday was pretty good too.  I saw Mount Eerie.  They were in full band mode and played the whole of Wind's Poem (!) plus a Microphones song (The Moon).  Phil E. is amazing.


"But where pulp films, like Black Metal, have the courage to be pulled along by the absurdity of their material, Trier cleverly contains the extremity within a frame of art-house tastefulness."
Mark Fisher

Which can either be read as condemnation or praise.  (How could we state this?  As the aestheticization of subcultures?  Fisher seems to think there's something novel about this, right?  But isn't this what art has always done?  & pop culture too?  Tock by way of Ray Charles by way of Gospel by way of...?) I like to think of Fisher's comment as praise (though I wonder about the 'tastefulness' of the whole thing).  I also like to think this could apply to Mount Eerie's new album (& much of his work in general).  I like Mount Eerie and Antichrist.

But I have a lot of questions when I listen to the Mount Eerie album too, & some (seeming) contradictions (or at best, recalcitrant data) always pop up.  These are: what is the relationship between Buddhism & Metal?  Landscape sound pieces & Twin Peaks?  If he's interested in letting everything go to the wind, why make anything at all?  & why steep it in nostalgia?  Is this the human element?  The inevitable failure of our ideals?

Questions of the same order arose when I saw "Antichrist" (in the theater.  twice.  glory, glory).  What's the relationship between Horror, Tarkovsky & a thesis on nature?


Maybe it's these frictions that open up meaning, that keep me there.  Maybe this is what it's really all about.  At the very least, it avoids the plakativ, which art has suffered from all too often.  I think (read for: wish) Christopher Higgs would say something better researched & more succinct about this.  Check out his latest entries at HTMLGIANT if you don't believe me.


We see this friction in other places too.  Luciano Chessa's music does this.  As does the music of Fausto Romitelli.  As do the video works by Nicolas Provost.  These are all things I like.




Anyway, the Mount Eerie concert was AWESOME.  The first band, Chen Santa Maria, was pretty grand too.  They were somewhere between Best Coast & Black Dice.  Nice!


THEN, I got word that > kill author 6 went online.  I'm really excited to see my words up with other people I read & respect.  Verity Hill (who, in a previous > ka, wrote about my childhood home Lake Tahoe) ended with this:

"In the cold rain these bundles and parcels of women collect shabby garments about them and draw dirty hoods over haunted faces. Ejected from the hatch of suspect haven, they are a dim confetti of hapless misdirection. Some of them shoe alleyways where doubtless dealers skulk them. Some band with others and make hunted haste, or are borne with them feckless away. Others stumble to the closest bench until they’re shoved off by cops onto others. They sit muttering or waiting for the freeze to saturate the core of some senseless internal refuge."


 Live it, live it.

20100413

∞ < ––– > ∞


I miss certain smells, codeine & Corona, cursing at basketball games, quilts, tortilla española & roasted peppers, glasses clanking, Wolke 9 Momente, walking, etc.


An X said she missed my mix cds.  I made this for all of mine.

20100412

A Very Bloggy Blog Entry


Hi.  Have you listened to this?  Well, you should.


I've been away & you've probably been around, doing your thang.  I was in the Alps, near Andechs, where they brew my favorite beer.  I wasn't there to drink beer but to teach children English and to swim in pools at the foot of a mountain.  It was pretty freaking wonderful.



While I was there, I used Joe Brainard's "I Remember" poem as a juices-flowing exercise.  It's an exercise I stole from Julia Cohen, so thank you Julia, if you're reading this.  The kids dug it and I think it was successful.  Here's what a 8 year old German Girl wrote: 

I remember we I in the Mai riding with my horse about the cloud and see a pig that's fantastig see out.   It is purple with blue and green it's can fly and it's love the Mai.  I remember too we I see a big elefant.  It's great and green it's can swim and fly and dance in the Mai.  The Mai is a funny monts where coulerfaul animail fly, swim and dance can.  I remember we I and my dog in a big leg jump and swim.  Suddely we see a big wal.  It is pink.  It says "Hello" and we says "Good afternoon" and we swim away.

 

Speaking of mountains (do you remember me speaking of mountains?), I've received a mountain of books, including D'Agata's "About a Mountain," which is wonderful & helpful.  I think I'd like to meet him one day.  He seems very nice.



Unfortunately, it looks like the German post lost my copies of "The Complete Works of Marvin K. Mooney," as well as the two latest editions of 6x6


I am, however, amused by the theater treffen's schedule.  Do you think I'll be able to meet Peter Handke or Elfriede Jelinek or the Nature Theater of Oklahoma?  If you were to interview any of these people, what would you ask?




I read "Brief Interviews with Hideous Men" & I was disappointed.  Everything felt like conceptual art, where I like the idea & the idea is enough, but the reading/seeing is a disappointment.  There were some gems in there for sure (the story about the high dive was jammmmmiiinnn'), but they didn't quite outweigh the blandness.  

I read "Hopscotch" & I wanted to throw the book at the wall.  Call 'em hipsters or beats or bohemians & I'll still never care.  Are Cortazar's short stories better?

I listened to alot of Scelsi & Mount Eerie & I felt pretty damned good.

Scelsi is really wild in a lot of ways.  I think more people should listen to him.



Berlin is blossoming & I think this is a good thing.  




I guess that's it for now.



Thanxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx